More Circumstantial Evidence that COVID-19 Originated in a Lab

I feel sorry for those who still think that this virus, whose outbreak literally started in the vicinity of Wuhan’s virology lab, believe it was from bat soup or some other natural interaction between humans and animals. The crazy idea that this virus, maybe… just maybe, escaped from a lab that did research on similar viruses in the same city, has been dismissed as an unfounded conspiracy as our media and politician gaslight us like never before. But as wholes in the official narrative become more and more painfully obvious, even the mainstream media is forced to consider that it is at least plausible, compared to the other nonsense we have been told since this COVID crisis began.

From CNBC:

Evidence that Covid-19 originally leaked from a Wuhan, China, virology lab is growing, Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC on Monday, pointing to reports that three researchers from the lab sought hospital care with a Covid-like illness in November 2019.

People a year ago who said this probably came from nature, it’s really unlikely it came from a lab, maybe a year ago that kind of a statement made a lot of sense because that was the more likely scenario,” Gottlieb, a former head of the Food and Drug Administration, said on “Squawk Box.” But we haven’t found the true source of this virus.

That’s because you’re looking at wet markets and bats, maybe you should be looking at the scientists who fell ill while working in the lab.

A previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report found that researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology sought hospital care after falling ill “with symptoms consistent with both Covid-19 and common seasonal illness,” The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday, quoting from the report.

Gottlieb said the growing number of reports provide an increasing amount of circumstantial evidence supporting the theory that the virus could have escaped from a lab.

Amazing! Who would have thought of doing something like connecting the dots could actually lead to something that makes more sense?

The question for a lot of people is going to be when are too many coincidences too much, when does it seem that there’s too many things suggesting that this could have come out of a lab,” he said.

Those of us critical thinkers believed it came out of the lab from day one, yet we were called all kinds of names, libeled, slandered, and even censored for expressing our thoughts. But now, as usual, the truth is coming out because the coverup of a man-made disaster can no longer be kept secret, especially when everything just doesn’t add up anymore, causing both governments and NGOs alike to constantly do 180s like they are professional ice skaters.

The World Health Organization has repeatedly said the virus most likely came from an animal host.

Who still takes these people seriously anymore?

But last week, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky acknowledged that it could have originated in a lab as “one possibility.”

The fact this narrative is even being considered a possibility now, shows there is too much evidence behind it that it is most likely to be the case. But if this were a man-made disaster, we will probably never know, because China will cover its tracks and make sure it will always remain a mystery—as is the case with many lies covered up in history.

Gottlieb said it’s unlikely we’ll ever know for sure. Unless there is a whistleblower or regime change in China, he said any evidence supporting the lab leak hypothesis won’t likely surface.